This is Your Brain on Jane Austen
I am a school psychologist by training and currently work in the role of middle school behavior resource specialist. I work with teachers to implement evidence-based strategies to support students with significant social, emotional, learning, and behavioral difficulties. Over my 14 years in the field, I've provided individual and group counseling (including crisis counseling after a school shooting), worked to have students placed in psychiatric hospital settings, written safety and behavior plans, and observed students engaging in some of the most erratic behaviors. I've also closely observed the behavior of students and teachers who not only thrive but excel.
With undergraduate and graduate degrees in psychology, I have long been fascinated by how the mind works and how people behave. My college education included a variety of classes ranging from personality characteristics, cognitive development, neuropsychology, applied behavior analysis, interpersonal relations, human sexuality, and abnormal psychology. You might reasonably ask what any of this has to do with Jane Austen? As I've grown to know more and more individuals who admire her work and have taken their admiration to the next level (e.g., via reading JA related fan fiction, participating in Jane Austen Society of North America (JASNA) meetings/events, and immersing themselves in regency costuming, etc.), I began to wonder whether we truly shared a similar turn of mind. Stated differently, if and how might our brains be similarly wired?
I have a (luckily well controlled) seizure disorder. As such, I have been under the care of a neurologist for many years. Just this past summer, I experienced some new neurological symptoms that required testing including a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan. While thinking of the composition and functioning of my brain, I conducted a simple, random Google search of the terms "Jane Austen" and "brain." That search yielded the following image (right) and a 2012 story from National Public Radio (NPR) titled, "Lively Mind: Your Brain on Jane Austen" (NPR Story). It is a worthwhile read that examines the nature of Elizabeth Bennet's lively mind and how Jane's incisive depiction of Lizzy's mental processes might be more aligned with our contemporary neuroscientific understanding than she could have ever known. NPR is not the only media outlet to explore this general topic. A similar story posted by Salon.com (Salon Story) also describes the study conducted by Stanford University. Hilariously, it asks, "How does one even read a book in an MRI machine?" Having recently undergone a scan, I must say this is a very good question indeed given the fact that the test required me to remain completely still for an extended period of time while my full (in every sense of the word) body was squeezed into an impossibly narrow tube.
Paige! I'm so glad to see that you've started this blog! Very exciting. And it was fascinating to learn more about how your educational background and personal experiences have brought you to this point. Experiencing seizures and MRIs cannot be fun at all (understatement!); I'm so impressed that you've used those experiences to create something positive and insightful.
ReplyDeleteAnd let's see...Jane Austen and the brain! There's something about reading her work aloud that just makes me feel as if I see the world a little more clearly. One aspect of her writing that I really appreciate is how she wields a razor sharp wit and yet is ultimately compassionate about human foibles and frailty. That's a very difficult balance to strike, and I like to think it's this balance that exercises our brain, for Austen doesn't always allow for the easy categorization of people.
Looking forward to reading more of your blog posts!
Hi Christina! Thanks for sharing your thoughts and lending your support to my blog! I agree that my background and life experiences provide an unique lens on our dear Jane, and I hope others enjoy this blog as it grows in readership. Even if it doesn't, it's a nice outlet for me!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that Jane's writings were balanced and embodied an ideal mix of compassion and humor. She did not take herself or others too seriously. I admire that, although she held strong moral convictions given her upbringing, she did not exhibit rigid black/white interpretations--if anything, she eschewed them as demonstrated by her characterization of Mary Bennet and her lack of condemnation of Lydia. Of course, there are countless other examples of this throughout her writings.